Institute of Medicine report on Nursing - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 827 Downloads: 7 Date added: 2019/10/10 Did you like this example? As our communities’ healthcare requirements turn multidimensional in the world today, nursing occupation should transform and take on greater duties to meet health care needs. According to the Institute of Medicine report, â€Å"The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, and Advancing Health† which was conscripted through the Institute of Medicine (IOM), in the year 2010, recommends a thorough change in the nursing practices, leadership as well as in the education.   The American Nurses Associated (ANA) has since admired the IOM report on the nursing profession and identifies the requirement the nurses to maintain leadership duties in the healthcare scheme to meet the great needs in the transformation of the nursing profession.. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Institute of Medicine report on Nursing" essay for you Create order To enhance primary healthcare, the Institute of Medicine joined hands with other partners in the year 2008, where they formed a two-year initiative, to genuinely look at the needs to access and to transform the nursing profession. In the project, they selected a commission to look into the future of nursing occupation, with a major goal of developing a report with commendations for an operative and competent strategy for the future of clinicians occupation. The commission through negotiations came up with four areas that would help in changing the nursing occupation (Phillips et al., 2014): The nurses to practice wholly on their levels of education as well as in training The nurses to accomplishgreater levels of training and education using the enhanced education systems that inspire seamless academic improvements. For an effective staff planning and strategy, the establishment requires a better information gathering and data organization. The nurses are to partner with other healthcare specialists in the reforming healthcare in the United States of America. As the transformations in the healthcare scheme start to meet the requirements of the society, having nurses who are highly educated, who holds a capability to practice in their full capacity, will be domineering in attaining the objectives of the IOM report. There are both culturally as well as legislatively, which have obstructed the entire extent of nursing practice through the progressive practice registered nurses (Pittman et al., 2015). Nation regulations concerning the scope of practice differ significantly from one country to another and aren’t reliant on institutional factors and the clinician’s competencies, but depend on political resolutions.   The latitude of practice oughtto echo on the educational and the training attained and must be standard through the US to offer a reliable quality healthcare. A cultural challenge which is encounteredis the ideology that intensifying nursing practice shakes both economic and professional roles of doctors and that the doctors are more competent where certain practices should only be accomplished merely by physicians.   The future of Nursing, Focus on latitude of practice articulates that there is enough proof to demonstrate that nurses offer quality healthcare to patients, comprising preventing medication errors, minimizing or eradicating infections as well as easing the transition from hospital to home. Through changes in health care service delivery, there is a greater emphasis on offering better primary health care and providing care to the society and not in the acute care arrangements. In the case where nurse’s practice to their entire capability might assist in minimizing patient workload, maximizeexcellence of care and offer services to individuals of the socioeconomic Presently, there are sufficient primary care doctors to cater for the needs of the agedpopulace,however the number of the improved practice registered clinicians is escalating.   Having nurses practice in their entire abilities for sure lessen patientworking load, improve excellence of care and offer services to individuals of socioeconomic upbringings who might have problems in receiving primary care (Sullivan et al., 2015). In leadership, nursing as an occupation is not observed by the general or the health populace as leaders. Through the Future of Nursing: Leading Change and Advancing Health recommends that clinicians be entirely in partnership with the doctors and other healthcare experts in the reformation health care in the US (Institute of Medicine, 2010). Clinicians require attaining greater levels of education, continuing in the enduring learning opportunities and upholding leadership associated training both professional and personal advancement in each clinician’s role in the occupation in assisting in attaining this objective. The nursing practice and research field require continuing being a proof based and implemented in clinician’s education. An alliance between the physicians and the nurses is vital for changes in the healthcare sector. To efficiently remodel health care system to be able to serve community progressing multi faceted demands, nurses require having to restruct ure on practice, their education as well as leaders. In conclusion, it’s apparent from the study, that the Institute of Medicine (IOM) has taken a vital part in changing nursing occupation more particularly in the primary health care. The IOM main aimsincreating archetypes of payments and to care delivery that utilizes clinicians in leadership capabilities and development to improve results and to reduce costs.   As nursing upholds the largest part of healthcare staff, they are supposed to hold a significant role in restructuring health care transformations.

Talk Shows - 5538 Words

TALK SHOWS The television talk show is, on the face of it, a rather strange institution. We pay people to talk for us. Like the soap opera, the talk show is an invention of twentieth century broadcasting. It takes a very old form of communication, conversation, and transforms it into a low cost but highly popular form of information and entertainment through the institutions, practices and technologies of television. The talk show did not originate over night, at one time, or in one place. It developed out of forty years of television practice and antecedent talk traditions from radio, Chatauqua, vaudeville and popular theater. In defining the talk show it is useful to distinguish between television talk (unscripted presentational†¦show more content†¦Successful talk show hosts like Mike Wallace, Johnny Carson, and Barbara Walters bridge generations of viewers. The longevity of these super stars increases their impact on the forms and formats of television talk with which they are associated. Television talk shows originally emerged out of two central traditions: news and entertainment. Over time hybrid forms developed that mixed news, public affairs, and entertainment. These hybrid forms occupy a middle ground position between news and entertainment, though their hosts (Phil Donahue, Oprah Winfrey, and Geraldo Rivera, for example) often got their training in journalism. Approximately a third of the major talk show hosts listed at the end of the essay came out of news. The other two thirds came from entertainment (comedy in particular). Within the journalistic tradition, the names Edward R. Murrow, Mike Wallace, Ted Koppel and Bill Moyers stand out. News talk hosts like Murrow, Koppel, and Moyers do not have bands, sidekicks, or a studio audience. Their roles as talk show hosts are extensions of their roles as reporters and news commentators. Their shows appear in evening when more adult and older aged viewers are watching. The morning host teams that mix happy talk and information also generally come from the news background. This format was pioneered by NBCs Sylvester Pat Weaver and host DaveShow MoreRelatedTalk Shows on Television1132 Words   |  4 Pagesyears, talk shows became one of the most watched on television. These talk shows are causing violence, teaching bad habits, loosing family value. Turn the television on in the afternoon and there will be one show you will not be able to pass up â€Å"The Jerry Springer Show†. Jerr-y! Jerr-y! Jerr-y! Jerr-y! The annoying â€Å"Jerr-y† chant that everyone knows. The women are going crazy for the Jerry beads makes it irresistible on changing the channel to another channel. This popular television show The JerryRead More The Culture of Talk Shows Essay1092 Words   |  5 PagesThe Culture of Talk Shows If social order is not a given, if it is not encoded in our DNA, then to some extent we are always in the process of producing virtual realities, some more functional than others. Habits, routines, and institutions are the patterns that create the world taken for granted. Knowledge of how to behave is contained in cultural scripts that are themselves products of human interaction and communication about the nature of reality. Shame, guiltRead MoreTalk Shows Essay624 Words   |  3 PagesTalk Shows In the world of television, talk shows have undoubtedly taken up almost every inch of space on daytime television, and while doing so has caused much controversy. In the nineteen eighties, soap opera’s and game shows ruled the daytime airwaves, but the nineties are definitely the decade of the talk shows. The craze of talk shows all seemed to start with the originals such as Geraldo Riveria, Donahue and Sally Jesse Rafael (now called Sally) In fact, many of their original topics areRead MoreTalk shows are becoming increasingly popular and widespread forms of entertainment, however the1700 Words   |  7 PagesTalk shows are becoming increasingly popular and widespread forms of entertainment, however the underlying premise behind these shows which was originally the idea of empowering individuals and allowing them to share their experiences, has been replaced by a focus on celebrity figures and largely insignificant matters of public interest. The Ellen Degeneres show is a co ntemporary talk show which although does include therapeutic narratives of disadvantaged individuals including Ellen’s own struggleRead More Television Talk Shows Essay3461 Words   |  14 PagesTelevision Talk Shows The United States’ longest running program is actually a news/talk show called Meet the Press. It began as a radio program in 1945, and had little changes when it was aired on NBC for the first half-hour television broadcast in November 1947. Meet the Press May have been the first talk show to be shown on television, but it wasn’t the first regularly scheduled talk show. Sylvester Weaver produced the first regularly programmed talk show called Broadway Open HouseRead MoreOprah : The Top Rated Talk Show835 Words   |  4 Pagesmorning talk show that was suffering from perennially poor ratings. It was the beginning of big things for Winfrey. My first day in Chicago, September 4, 1983. I set foot in this city, and just walking down the street, it was like roots, like the motherland. I knew I belonged here, she would later say. Winfrey was an instant success as a talk show host. In a few short months after taking over, her show surpassed then-reigning talk-show king Donahue to become the top-rated talk show in ChicagoRead MoreOprah Winfrey, famous talk show host and philanthropist, can be considered a hero by any standards.700 Words   |  3 PagesOprah Winfrey, famous talk show host and philanthropist, can be considered a hero by any standards. Her life is an almost perfect representation of the mythological hero archetype. Commonalities include; overcoming extreme obstacles through her rise from a rough childhood, early recognition of talents in her career and an accomplishment of great deeds through her work as a philanthropist. Oprah is an inspiration to young women everywhere, proving that anything is possible. She will be rememberedRead MoreEllen Degeneres Essay1236 Words   |  5 PagesEllen DeGeneres is an Emmy Award winning talk show host and an outstanding comedian. Some of you may know her as t he voice of Dory on Finding Nemo, or even as a judge on American Idol. Whatever you know her from, you probably know that Ellen isn’t afraid to be unique. Ellen talks about being true to yourself. She says, â€Å"Find out who you are and be that person. That’s what your soul was put on this Earth to be. Find that truth, live that truth and everything else will come.† I chose Ellen forRead MoreEssay about The Effect of Television on Humans1334 Words   |  6 Pagesthe lives of millions of viewers. Television, as many researchers and scientists have said, influences the thoughts of its audience in good and, unfortunately bad ways, with TV broadcasters doing whatever necessary to profit from their shows. Television has a big impact on the youth of today, is the fact that our children are able to view scenes of sex, violence and excess bad language at such an early age have an affect on their future’s? DOES TELEVISION INFLUENCE OURRead MoreI Am Not A Huge Believer On Conspiracy Theories, But There s Something Odd About Sandy Hook1026 Words   |  5 Pagesat the exact time the first new chopped shows up. As the media reported, they got mixed reports of what weapons were used. The first report states the shooter used four hand guns and an assault rifle. Later, the report changed to two handguns, an assault rifle and a shotgun were recovered. The big red flag with the media is when the families of the victims were interviewed. The families almost seemed to have scripted lines. They also did not look like or talk like a family that just lost someone dear

Ontario’s Nuclear Plants Free Essays

Ontario†s nuclear power planets are damaging our environment and economic structure; nuclear power should be shut down and replaced with safer methods of power making. Ontario†s nuclear power is not the safe and clean way to produce power, Ontario†s nuclear plants are becoming outdated, nuclear waste is building up, and contamination is becoming more of a threat. Ontario thought that nuclear was clean, safe, and cheap way to produce power. We will write a custom essay sample on Ontario’s Nuclear Plants or any similar topic only for you Order Now During the 1950s, Ontario Hydro was looking for new sources of electricity to meet the growing demand. In 1954, a partnership was formed between Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL), Ontario Hydro and Canadian General Electric to build Canada†s first nuclear power plant called NPD for Nuclear Power Demonstration. In 1962, NPD began supplying the province of Ontario with its first nuclear generated electricity. Ontario had found it†s new source of electricity, and they were not fully aware consequences that would happen after many years of use. Power projects (later AECL CANDU), based in Toronto. Ontario and Montreal, Quebec became responsible for implementing AECL†s nuclear power program and marketing CANDU reactors. Nuclear power was cheap, if you did not have to worry about the waste. This was the answer to Ontario†s power problems, so they invested in the newest source of power at the time. Most people believed that nuclear power was a good change in Ontario†s power structure, and there would be no real problems in the future. Ontario needed a new source of power in the 1950s; they found it in nuclear power and it solved the problem. In the 1950s the average person did not have a lot of knowledge about nuclear energy, and nuclear studies were being held. All people really knew was the positive side of things, the government and research body†s made videos that would try to describe nuclear energy to the public. The videos would talk about how great nuclear power and how abundant nuclear energy was. Making it sound like the answer to all our electric needs. The government and research body kind of jumped around the subject of nuclear waste, and the effects it could have on a human or the environment. The real truths about nuclear energy was not as widely known, and the majority of the people thought that nuclear energy was a positive step in the right direction. Ontario has a huge problem with the build up of nuclear waste, and this waste could have a huge impact on our environment if something were to go wrong. Radioactive mops, rags, clothing, tools, and contaminated equipment such as filters and pressure tubes, are temporality stored in shallow underground containers at the Bruce Nuclear Complex and elsewhere. At Bruce, a radwaste incinerator reduces the volume of combustible radioactive waste materials. In 1975, St. Mary’s School in Port Hope was evacuated because of high radiation levels in the cafeteria. It was soon learned that large volumes of radioactive wastes from uranium refining operations had been used as construction material in the school and all over town. Hundreds of homes were contaminated. There are 200 million tons of sand-like uranium tailings in Canada, mostly in Ontario and Saskatchewan. These radioactive wastes will remain hazardous for hundreds of thousands of years. They contain some of the most powerful carcinogens known: radium, radon gas, polonium, thorium and others. Radio-active tailings also result from phosphate ores and other ores rich in uranium. In 1978, an Ontario Royal Commission recommended that a panel of world class ecologists study the long-term problem of radioactive tailings and that the future of nuclear power be assessed in view of their findings. The government has ignored these recommendations. Nuclear waste is biodegradable, but it takes it takes hundreds of thousands of years to do so, which could leave unimaginable results in the future. Lately Ontario†s nuclear power plants have been going threw horrible management, out dated equipment, and nuclear waste build up; resulting in economic breakdown. Ontario†s nuclear plants have not had their equipment greatly updated, which is a big problem that could be costly to fix. When calculated in real 1998 dollars, total federal subsidies to Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) for the last 46 years amount to $15. 8 billion. It should be noted that $15. 8 billion is a real cash subsidy to AECL, and does not include any opportunity cost? What the subsidies would have been worth if the government had invested in more cost competitive ventures. At a rate of 15%, the opportunity cost of government subsidies to AECL is $202 billion. There is also federal financial support for other nuclear activities in progress or impending, including: the Whiteshell Laboratories privatization ($23. 1 million); the MAPLE reactors at Chalk River Laboratories ($120 million); the Canadian Neutron Facility ($400 million); radioactive waste management and decommissioning ($665 million); and reactor exports ($2. 5 billion considered). In Ontario the bad management and the old equipment has lead to major change in the way the plats work. Also this will cost billions of dollars to do. In the long run Ontario†s nuclear do not make the money needed to stay open, with the costs of fixing them and reforming them it would just cost to much, so there is no point in doing so. Ontario has purposed to close down all of there nuclear plants, but they decided that is would be better to keep most of them open. There are much more safer, cleaner, and cheaper ways of producing power. We could invest solar, wind or tide power sources, all of which are safe. Leaving these nuclear plants open is like trying to heal your cut with a knife. Ontario and its people don†t realize that with the build up of nuclear waste, we could be looking into major crises. Many of Ontario Hydro†s problems are monetary in origin. The corporation has had difficulty maintaining its nuclear facilities in accordance with the Atomic Energy Control Board†s safety requirements. Hydro†s restructuring efforts reflect past negligence in preventive, minor, and responsive maintenance. It is now faced with a situation wherein the demand for energy must be met through the means of an increasingly limited resource . . . money. In response to this problem, the energy formerly supplied through nuclear power is being replaced primarily with coal-driven electrical generation. Hydro has implemented a short-term, quick fix solution based on the same practices and assumptions, which originally lead to the failure of Ontario†s nuclear energy program. As of now Ontario stands by its nuclear power and they do not have any current plans to shut down or totally reform these plants. Ontario†s nuclear power plants are a Danger to our environment, the economy, and a danger to the people, us; we should shut down all of these plants and replace them with safer methods. How to cite Ontario’s Nuclear Plants, Essay examples